Learning 2010: The Continuing Power of Collaboration

Looking back at what we learned this year produces some interesting conclusions—not the least of which is that it wasn’t so much a year of trying to create something entirely new, but, rather, a time to step back long enough to survey what surrounded us and learn more effectively how to use the collaborative resources we’ve been given: wikis. Shared document tools including Google Docs and Dropbox that are helping us incorporate cloud computing into our training-teaching-learning efforts. Web-conferencing tools ranging from WebEx, Dimdim, and TalkShoe to Google Talk and Skype for the delivery of just-in-time learning. And LinkedIn discussion groups and Twitter as a way of seeking and exchanging information that contributed to more effective learning for everyone involved rather than as a way to simply tell others where we were sitting and drinking coffee or waiting for a bus to arrive.

What remains at the heart of this learning process is the power of collaboration face to face as well as online, and what made 2010 so fruitful for so many of us was the way we managed to work together in a variety of often overlapping settings to the benefit of learners and our learning colleagues. If you haven’t yet hopped on the train, let’s take a ride together to see how these tools and how collaboration have been serving us and may well end up serving us even more effectively in the months and years to come.

The ALA Learning Round Table provides a natural starting point. In addition to providing an ongoing collaborative forum for face-to-face exchanges at American Library Association conferences to promote and support effective learning opportunities for members and prospective members, it has been developing a wiki where trainers can post as well as seek resources developed by their colleagues. The Round Table’s monthly online meetings further advance its mission of helping trainer-teacher-learners collaborate to produce resources and results that we would otherwise not enjoy. And ALA Learning—the blog where this piece is being posted—not only provides us impetus to collaborate through sharing articles but also contributes to the larger goal of drawing together trainers who are working within or working side by side with libraries rather than leaving all those one-person training offices and libraries without formal training programs in a frustrated state of isolation.

Another productive community of learners where collaboration is the order of the day is Maurice Coleman’s biweekly online T is for Training discussions. Interested regulars—the “usual suspects”—and guests frequently interact during these online hour-long free-ranging conversations via Talkshoe on a variety of topics of interest and importance to those involved in workplace learning and performance, and those discussions helped open doors this year to routes of exploration such as the possibility of helping promote the development of libraries as social learning centers. They also led to additional collaborations including the webinar Maurice and I designed and delivered in October 2010 to more than 400 participants for WebJunction—another great collaborative forum for trainer-teacher-learners in libraries. All of these tools and resources are easy to access and/or use, and they are well worth considering for workplace learning and performance programs.

The American Society for Training & Development (ASTD) remains yet another gathering place at the local, regional, and national levels face to face as well as online for many of us. Opportunities for productive collaborations abound at many levels: through membership on Chapter boards and collaboration at national conferences, through learning opportunities provided via webinars, through postings on LinkedIn discussion groups, and through groups including the National Advisors for Chapters which meet face to face and use a variety of online tools and posted online documents to do business throughout the year.

My own familiarity and comfort with collaboration via wikis took a quantum leap this fall when I was accepted onto the New Media Consortium’s 2011 Horizon Report Advisory Board; all 40 of us from countries all over the world did all our work asynchronously, online, via the wiki which leads to completion of the report; among the pleasant surprises, given the small number of people involved in this worldwide project, was the discovery that ALA Learning colleague Lauren Pressley was part of the group.

If anyone remains unsold on the powerful benefits provided by collaboration and the use of the social networking tools we’ve been exploring, Tony Bingham and Marcia Conner’s new release, The New Social Learning: A Guide to Transforming Organizations Through Social Media, may prove to be the tipping point. As James Surowiecki notes in The Wisdom of Crowds, those who engage in collaborations are often the most prolific and successful at what they do (pp. 162-163). And that, of course, remains a lesson well worth absorbing anytime—not solely in the year just ending.
N.B.: Those interested in exploring the theme of collaboration through a variety of tools and other resources will find plenty of options in “Community and Collaboration in an Onsite-Online World: An Annotated Bibliography.”

Paul Signorelli

Paul Signorelli is a writer, trainer, presenter, and consultant based in the San Francisco Bay Area. He works with clients to successfully facilitate the introduction of new technology into organizations; prepares and presents webinars and other online and onsite learning opportunities for a variety of clients; is actively involved in ALA and ASTD; continues to prepare articles for "American Libraries," the eLearning Guild's "Learning Solutions Magazine," and other publications; and co-wrote "Workplace Learning & Leadership" with Lori Reed for ALA editions. Paul can be reached at paul@paulsignorelli.com.

Website - Twitter - More Posts

Welcome to the ALA Learning Family

ALA Learning contributing author Lauren Pressley and her husband John welcomed a new baby  to the world on May 1st at 6:00 pm. He weighed 8 pounds 4 ounces and was 21 inches long.  His name, Leif, is Scandinavian, can mean “heir” or “beloved,” and is pronounced “layf.”

Congratulations Lauren and John, and welcome to the world Leif!

You can read more at Lauren’s blog.

Lori Reed

Lori Reed, Managing Editor of ALA Learning, has more than 15 years experience in training and is the Learning & Development Coordinator for the Charlotte Mecklenburg Library where she oversees the learning & development of a diverse group of staff at twenty libraries. Lori’s passions are performance consulting, learning strategies, and e-learning. Lori is coauthor, with Paul Signorelli, of Workplace Learning and Leadership: A Handbook for Library and Nonprofit Trainers. Lori also blogs at LoriReed.com and can be reached at lori[at]lorireed.com.

Website - Twitter - Facebook - More Posts

Teaching the Teachers

As Paul pointed out, train the trainer programs are really useful but are not necessarily offered all that often. Since one of my most recent projects was one of these programs, I thought I’d kick off my posts on this blog with a discussion on that project.

The program? We called it Teaching Teaching. (I described it in detail on my blog the other day.) Instead of going into the specifics of planning and content, I’ll use this space to talk a little bit about the drive behind the program, what made it successful, and how we knew it had done its job.

DEFINING “TEACHING TEACHING”

Teaching Teaching was a program that I worked on with a colleague, Roz Tedford, to support teaching at our library. We’re a mid-sized academic library that teaches traditional library instruction, technology workshops, credit bearing classes, and workshops for faculty.

This program took the form of a one-credit “course.” The program took place over two semesters (and will likely be revived in future semesters as well). In each, we treated it like a one-credit course, without the assignments and testing. The goal was to make a very low barrier for participation… the only thing people had to do was save an hour in the morning to show up.

For the first semester, Roz and I led classes. We’d model good instructional practices, and stick to around 20 minutes of lecture and discussion followed by an active learning exercise. We’d try to vary the exercises so that after the class was completed, people had a toolkit of potential activities to use when teaching.

The second semester followed a different model. By the time we had the second semester course, we changed the model. I wanted people to realize that they didn’t need an “expert” at the front of the classroom telling them what to think about and that every teacher is a potential resource. I started the semester with a facilitated discussion about what people wanted to learn, and set up the semester’s schedule around that. Then, each week, I sat with everyone else in the classroom and facilitated discussion.

WHY IT TOOK OFF

People were asking for a program like this. Teaching Teaching wasn’t something that I decided everyone needed to do. It wasn’t something the administration felt the library needed, either. Teaching Teaching evolved from several discussions I had with different librarians in the building and was based on their needs and interests.

People had a drive to do more with their teaching. People were already good teachers. Some had been teaching for a very long time. But people were interested in learning more about the principles behind what they were doing, understanding the research that supported some of the techniques they were interested in trying, and improving the good teaching already taking place.

This course was an opportunity for instructors with no obligations. I firmly believe that Teaching Teaching went over well because it was presented as an opportunity that people could choose to participate in, with no expectations for preparation or outside work. Finding one hour for something you’re motivated to do is much easier than finding an hour plus extra work time. And since people chose to participate on their own, there was no resistance to the program.

WHAT MADE IT SUCCESSFUL

Classes contained useful information. People came to learn, so I made sure we were covering content that would be useful. I planned the curriculum for the first course, because I understood the issues people were interested in learning more about and I had the background to know how to structure the content. And the second course was even more student-driven, as the entire curriculum was based off the conversation from the first day of class. Since we were all using valuable time to participate, I wanted to be sure that every class had something for everyone.

Active learning was central to the design of the workshops. We knew people wanted to learn more about how to incorporate active learning techniques, and we knew it would help people learn the content more effectively. However, as most of the participants preferred learning in lecture-style settings, we were careful to construct exercises that would be non threatening, and would make good use of pair and group work. In the end, people enjoyed it and had new ideas about how to incorporate active learning into their own teaching.

The class became a community of learner/teachers. I heard over and over again that people got as much out of being part of the group as they did from the content of the courses. People said that having an hour a week to set aside for thinking about instruction helped them be more intentional and reflective of their work. Knowing that they’d have a session to share new ideas and ask questions every week meant they were able to adapt and change things more quickly. And, as we phased into the second semester, the transition to a learning community was truly illustrated as I shifted to a role where I tried to keep my mouth shut for much of the sessions.

HOW WE KNEW THE PROGRAM WAS A SUCCESS

People kept coming back. I originally had doubts about attendance for this program. An hour every week for two semesters meant people were devoting up to 30 hours of time to the program, or nearly a work week of the year. Everyone’s swamped (who isn’t these days), yet over half our teachers attended every session for the first class, and a smaller group of the same people attended every session of the second semester. Nothing says things are going well like repeat attendees!

People indicated they didn’t need a third semester. Towards the end of the second course, I started asking around about the need for another semester. I felt people had a pretty good grasp of the material, and wasn’t sure it was the best use of time at that point. And most people agreed. However, it was interesting that many asked we reserve the right to do something like this again, perhaps at a more advanced level, in future semesters.

Librarians started doing more instructional design. I noticed that librarians were doing more instructional design. Whether it was redesigning their credit course based on the Teaching Teaching information or working with faculty members to adapt their assignments based on library resources or technologies, more librarians were doing more instructional design work as part of their day-to-day jobs.

My role had changed. When I first became the Instructional Design Librarian I often worked with library staff to adapt their classes based on specific issues. By the end of the Teaching Teaching program I more often met with library staff to verify that they were on the right track and doing good work. My role as an instructional designer had shifted from a consultant role to a second set of eyes to double check the (good!!) work that had already been done.

So that’s the story of Teaching Teaching. Don’t worry, I didn’t teach myself out of a job. But as a train the trainer program, it was a successful one. With good planning, some work along the way, and constant feedback from participants, we were able to develop a program that supported the work of the library and is helping us better meet the needs of our users.

Have you done any train the trainer programs? What made them work for your community? How did you know they worked?

Image Credits:

pronouncing dictionary by Muffet
Shuttle Endeavour Blastoff by jurvetson
successful business woman on a laptop by Search Engine People Blog
New Years Eve 2006 by monkeyc.net

Lauren Pressley is the Instructional Design Librarian at Wake Forest University. She also blogs at Lauren’s Library Blogs and spends a fair amount of time at Twitter, too.

Lauren Pressley

Lauren Pressley is the Instructional Design Librarian at Wake Forest University. In this role she works with librarians and faculty to improve the design of their teaching and to share information about integrating appropriate educational technology. She also works with emerging technologies. Lauren’s passion is helping people learn about the changing information landscape and think about what that means for them as consumers and producers of information. Recently Lauren published So You Want To Be a Librarian and Wikis for Libraries. She was an ALA Emerging Leader in 2008 and was a recognized as a Library Journal Mover & Shaker in 2009. She frequently writes and presents on education, instruction, technology, and the future of libraries. Lauren also blogs at ALA Learning, tweets as @laurenpressley, and can be reached at lauren@laurenpressley.com.

Website - Twitter - More Posts

23 Questions with Lauren Pressley

Hi everyone! I’m very excited to be joining the ALA Learning team, and am glad to get to introduce myself in such a fun way. It’s hard to follow so many creative answers, but I liked the format, so here we go…

1. Your One Sentence Bio

  • I’m just another geeky librarian.

2. Do you blog? If yes, how did you come up with your blog name?

  • I do! I blog over at Lauren’s Library Blog. I know; it’s not really a descriptive name, is it? I started it during library school, when I wasn’t really sure what I was going to end up doing. The vague name allowed me to talk about whatever classes I was taking at the time. A year or so ago I thought about moving to something more descriptive, but apparently I’m not too creative, and just stuck with the same old name. :)

3. What is your professional background?

  • I blogged about this just the other day! I’ve been hanging out and working in libraries for most of my life, since elementary school as a volunteer. All of my full-time work has been at Wake Forest University in North Carolina. First as a microtext specialist, and now as an instructional design librarian.

4. What training do you do? staff? patrons? types of classes?

  • I’ll teach pretty much anything. I teach credit-based courses for undergraduates, one-shot classes for students, workshops and classes for library staff, and even classes for teaching assistants and faculty. Of course, I tend to teach different things to these different audiences; topics range from basic information literacy skills for first year students to information issues for those about to graduate to pedagogy or syllabus design for faculty.

5. What training do you think is most important to libraries right now?

  • All training is important. Over and over I hear from people about how hard it is to keep up with things. Trainers that keep up can help other staff members by synthesizing current trends and information and providing the most relevant information in easy to digest sessions.

6. Where do you get your training?

  • Three years ago I would have said, “from blogs.” Now I’d say it’s a combination of things: blogs still provide a lot of good content, Twitter points to new information fast, the library literature is full of in-depth information. I listen to a lot of technology related podcasts. I read a lot and spend a lot of time having conversations with people about trends and what they think is important. I also get a lot out of going to conferences and attending sessions. But pretty much, I take it anywhere I can get it, so I’m sure I’m leaving things out.

7. How do you keep up?

  • See answer six. :)

8. What do you think are the biggest challenges libraries are facing right now?

  • Time–at least in the libraries that I regularly talk with. It seems that everyone is trying to do more with the same, or less, staff as before. So it’s not very meta, or very big picture (which is very unusual for me), but it is very practical. Finding time to do everything that needs to be doing seems to be a challenge for a lot of us.

9. What are biggest challenges for trainers?

  • Well, to piggy-back on question eight, for me it’s planning training sessions that people can actually find time to attend! And it’s hard to know what’s going to resonate with a group. Just last semester I offered a class that several people requested, and no one signed up. I offered another on a whim and at a busier time of year, and it was the best attended workshop I’ve ever led. Figuring out what topics people will be interested in, as well as the timing that will get the most attendees, can be a bigger challenge than it seems.

10. What exciting things are you doing training wise?

  • I just wrapped up a program called “teaching teaching” that I worked on with another colleague. For one semester we offered a weekly hour long “class” on basic teaching principles for teaching library staff across campus. There was still demand the next semester, so I  facilitated weekly hour long discussions on topics of interest to teaching library staff. We had really good turnout throughout the entire program, but all agreed that now that everyone has a baseline of understanding of teaching topics, we could offer it every few semesters. Now I’m pulling together an online resource for this same group on teaching technologies.

11. What do you wish were you doing?

  • I feel very lucky. I love what I’m doing and am quite happy with it!

12. What would you do with a badger?

  • Take photos of it and post them to Flickr.

13. What’s your favorite food?

  • I like most any food, as long as it’s Vegan.

14. Post it notes or the back of your hand?

  • My phone, or maybe Evernote. I’m not a big fan of scraps of paper around my workspace, and I don’t like writing on myself all that much. I keep a notebook for longer notes, and use my phone for short reminders.

15. Windows or Mac?

  • Fluent in both, but I’m also using Ubuntu. The three computers I run each have their own OS. My favorite of the three is my Mac.

16. What’s your take on handshakes?

  • I’m a fan. Handshakes should be firm.

17. How did you get into this line of work?

  • Incredible luck, supportive supervisors and administrators, and with intense enthusiasm.

18. Why is the best part of your job?

  • I get to do so many interesting things! No, wait… it’s that I get to think about big picture issues and do something with it! I mean… it’s that I work with really awesome people! Oh, shoot. I’ll never be able to pick the best part. :)

19. Why should someone else follow in your shoes?

  • Ummm, I picked “my shoes” out because they were a good fit for where I wanted to go. I’m guessing people with other destinations or interests might choose different ones. Others will have to judge which shoes will take them where they want to go.

20. Sushi or hamburger?

  • Some sort of vegetable sushi.

21. LSW or ALA?

  • I adore both. In very different ways.

22. What one person in the world do you want to have lunch with and why?

  • I’d time travel to the future (that’s not off limits, is it?) to meet baby boy Borwick. It’d be fun to get to know a little bit about who this little mystery person will be.

23. What cell phone do you have and why?

  • I was one of those people standing in line for an iPhone the day they came out. I have been immensely happy with it, though I’ve had to work hard to keep the technology as a tool to make my life easier, rather than a technology that drives my life (for example, by making it too easy to check email all the time). It’s a great little device, and I love how it lets me do things that a bag of gadgets used to let me do.

Lauren Pressley

Lauren Pressley is the Instructional Design Librarian at Wake Forest University. In this role she works with librarians and faculty to improve the design of their teaching and to share information about integrating appropriate educational technology. She also works with emerging technologies. Lauren’s passion is helping people learn about the changing information landscape and think about what that means for them as consumers and producers of information. Recently Lauren published So You Want To Be a Librarian and Wikis for Libraries. She was an ALA Emerging Leader in 2008 and was a recognized as a Library Journal Mover & Shaker in 2009. She frequently writes and presents on education, instruction, technology, and the future of libraries. Lauren also blogs at ALA Learning, tweets as @laurenpressley, and can be reached at lauren@laurenpressley.com.

Website - Twitter - More Posts

Welcome Lauren Pressley and Buffy Hamilton

I am pleased to announce two new regular contributors to ALA Learning…Lauren Pressley and Buffy Hamilton.

Lauren Pressley, author of  So You Want To Be a Librarian and Wikis for Libraries, is the Instructional Design Librarian at Wake Forest University and will bring the voice of an academic librarian to the ALA Learning table. Lauren’s passion is helping libraries and university community members learn about the changing information landscape and think about what that means for them as consumers and producers of information.

Buffy Hamilton, also known as The Unquiet Librarian, is the founding librarian of “The Unquiet Library” at Creekview High School in Canton, Georgia. She is passionate about creating library experiences for her students that will encourage them to be lifelong learners and advocates for the power of the library in her community.

We now have a diverse team of 11 fabulous bloggers representing the perspectives of:

  • Public libraries
  • Academic libraries
  • School libraries
  • Library cooperatives
  • Vendors
  • Freelance consultants

Please join me in welcoming Lauren and Buffy, and I hope you are enjoying the getting to know the authors posts as much as I am!

Lori Reed

Lori Reed, Managing Editor of ALA Learning, has more than 15 years experience in training and is the Learning & Development Coordinator for the Charlotte Mecklenburg Library where she oversees the learning & development of a diverse group of staff at twenty libraries. Lori’s passions are performance consulting, learning strategies, and e-learning. Lori is coauthor, with Paul Signorelli, of Workplace Learning and Leadership: A Handbook for Library and Nonprofit Trainers. Lori also blogs at LoriReed.com and can be reached at lori[at]lorireed.com.

Website - Twitter - Facebook - More Posts